Constitutional Revolution of Gandhara: Difference between revisions

From escforumwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 50: Line 50:
==Causes of the Revolution==
==Causes of the Revolution==
After the establishment of the [[Wikipedia:Russian_Constitution_of_1906|Russian Constitution]] and the [[Wikipedia:Persian_Constitution_of_1906|Persian Constitution]] in 1906, a demand for modernization of the Gandhari political structure was born. Up to the beginning of the 20th century, Gandhara was an autocratic country. Emir Rahimullah al-Mansur held unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and its people. Despite a [[Wikipedia:Liberalism|progressive]] and [[Wikipedia:Intellectualism|academic]] agitation for more political democracy, the emir refused to enact fundamental reforms.
After the establishment of the [[Wikipedia:Russian_Constitution_of_1906|Russian Constitution]] and the [[Wikipedia:Persian_Constitution_of_1906|Persian Constitution]] in 1906, a demand for modernization of the Gandhari political structure was born. Up to the beginning of the 20th century, Gandhara was an autocratic country. Emir Rahimullah al-Mansur held unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and its people. Despite a [[Wikipedia:Liberalism|progressive]] and [[Wikipedia:Intellectualism|academic]] agitation for more political democracy, the emir refused to enact fundamental reforms.
Industrial workers began to feel dissatisfied with the government. The workers had to work under harsh conditions and they had little to no rights. A third cause of the revolution was the fact that the emir granted special privileges to the [[Wikipedia:United_Kingdom|United Kingdom]] and [[Wikipedia:French_Third_Republic|France]]. The Al-Mansur family saw Western European powers as important allies, and therefore the emir granted their ships free access to the main harbours and he gave several fiscal privileges to English and French companies. Resentment began to build over the fact that the emir valued the relations with European "imperialists" higher than the relationships with neighbouring Muslim countries.


[[Category:Gandhara]]
[[Category:Gandhara]]
[[Category:20th-century revolutions]]
[[Category:20th-century revolutions]]

Revision as of 11:04, 20 March 2015

Constitutional Revolution of Gandhara
Part of the Revolutions of 1917–23
Date 14 February – 22 June 1918
Location Gandhara
Result Al-Mansur Government victory
  • Revolutionaries defeated
  • Rahimullah al-Mansur retains the throne
  • Constitution enacted
  • Establishment of a constitutional monarchy
Belligerents
Imperial Government
  • Gandhari Army
Revolutionaries

Supported by:

The Constitutional Revolution of Gandhara (Arabic: ثورة الدستورية لل غانذارا) was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of Gandhara during the spring of 1918. Inspired by the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the abdication of Nicholas II, the unrest was directed against the autocratic rule of Emir Rahimullah al-Mansur.

Causes of the Revolution

After the establishment of the Russian Constitution and the Persian Constitution in 1906, a demand for modernization of the Gandhari political structure was born. Up to the beginning of the 20th century, Gandhara was an autocratic country. Emir Rahimullah al-Mansur held unrestricted political power over the sovereign state and its people. Despite a progressive and academic agitation for more political democracy, the emir refused to enact fundamental reforms.

Industrial workers began to feel dissatisfied with the government. The workers had to work under harsh conditions and they had little to no rights. A third cause of the revolution was the fact that the emir granted special privileges to the United Kingdom and France. The Al-Mansur family saw Western European powers as important allies, and therefore the emir granted their ships free access to the main harbours and he gave several fiscal privileges to English and French companies. Resentment began to build over the fact that the emir valued the relations with European "imperialists" higher than the relationships with neighbouring Muslim countries.